Friday, the Los Angeles municipal council granted final approval to a radical rezoning plan which aims to stimulate the development of housing along the trade corridors and existing dense residential districts.
During a vote of 14-0, the members of the board approved the so-called housing incentive program across the city.
The new prescription will provide developers with incentives to build both market and affordable units. It represents the main strategy of Los Angeles to achieve state housing objectives which force the city to find land where 255,000 additional houses can be built.
Unanimous vote on Friday comes when the city was facing a state deadline next week to have a housing plan in place and it highlights a process of several years that has been entangled with questions on Capital, traffic and layout of the city.
Within the framework of the housing incentive program at the city level, commonly known as the chip prescription, developers will be able to exceed the current construction limits if they include a certain percentage of affordable units in their new development and that property is close to public transport.
The 100% affordable projects will be eligible for incentives in a wider band in the city.
In both cases, developers can generally only use incentives if a property is in an existing multifamilial district or a commercial area.
The unified areas will be left largely intact, unless the property belongs to a public agency or a denominational organization, which represents only a ribbon of the city’s unifamilial land.
The planning service initially explored allowing much more buildings in the unified districts, which was supported by groups of tenants and equity that wanted low -income housing in these areas to combat a segregation inheritance.
The department, however, abandoned the plans following the declines of the groups of owners concerned by the changes in their neighborhoods, including traffic and noise. In December, the municipal council rejected a late effort to move the course, although certain members of the Council expressed their interest in opening up unifamilial districts to a limited quantity of new development in the future.
Groups of tenants have said that the concentration of redevelopment in areas that already allow multifamilial housing could cause mass travel, as developers eliminate existing apartments to build larger and larger buildings.
The planning service said they had tried to respond to concerns about equity and the displacement in several ways.
This allowed developers of larger incentives if their prizes are in commercial bands and multifamilial districts which are also near jobs and good schools.
And the rules for the protection of separate tenants adopted on Friday, low -income residents moved by demolition of the right to enter the new development in their previous rent or their rent deemed affordable to their income, according to the first possibility.
These residents would generally receive aid for extended relocation to help them allow themselves to be renting in a market rate unit for 42 months, the average time required to build a new building of apartments, depending on the city.
California Daily Newspapers
