Interior secretary, Yvette Cooper, is the latest minister who has not yet concluded a financing agreement with the Treasury before examining Wednesday expenses, includes BBC News.
The ministers were locked in talks with Chancellor Rachel Reeves and her team before the main financial statements, which establishes budgets for government services covering the next few years.
The Housing Secretary Angela Rayner reached a settlement Sunday evening after the “progress” in the negotiations, learned the BBC, but Cooper holds the talks also involving n ° 10.
Police budgets are expected to obtain an increase in the real exlion in each of the next three years, but negotiations continue on the broader budget of the home office.
Earlier Sunday, the Secretary of Technology Peter Kyle said that the police should “do their part” to reform public services.
Kyle Said BBC Sunday with Laura Kuensberg that “each part of society was struggling” And that the chancellor faced the pressure of all the departments for additional funding.
He said the exam would stimulate spending on schools and scientific research, but refused to exclude the police.
Earlier Sunday, BBC News was informed that the ministers of the home office did not think that there was enough money to recruit the 13,000 new officers of support for the police and the community promised in its manifesto.
Kyle said the government has already provided an additional billion pounds to the police, adding: “We provide investments in the police.
“We expect the police to start adopting the change they have to make to make their share for change.”
Kyle also refused to guarantee that Rayner’s housing service would be protected from budget cuts when asked the government’s plan to build 1.5 million new houses at the end of Parliament.
But he added: “We have made a manifest commitment. We are absolutely focused on the laser to deliver it.”
Last -minute talks should be ahead of what should be a very important week for each part of the government.
It is expected that there will be additional money for the NHS, with reports that the Ministry of Health will receive increased funding.
A substantial increase in the financing of the NHS would be to the detriment of other parties of the government, because the Chancellor seeks to respect her own tax rules, which must not borrow to finance daily expenses, and so that the debt decreases as a share of national income by 2029/30.
But other parties of the government will see their budgets in a hurry while the Chancellor seeks to respect her own tax rules, which must not borrow to finance daily expenses, and for debt to fall as part of national income by 2029/30.
Certain elements of what will be included in the declaration has appeared in recent days.
Sunday evening, the government announced funding of 24 million pounds sterling to stimulate artificial intelligence lessons in schools, as part of a wider package of 187 million pounds sterling to increase technological skills through the economy.
Earlier Sunday, the government announced a package of 86 billion pounds Sterling for science and technology to help finance drug treatments and sustainable batteries.
On Wednesday, the Chancellor unveiled a package of 15.6 billion pounds Sterling to finance extensions on trams, trains and buses in the Grand Manchester, the Midlands and the North East.
Expenditure decisions come in the context of a broad commitment to increase defense expenses to 3% by 2034.
The government has already undertaken to increase defense expenses by 2.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP) to 2.5% by 2027 – 5 billion additional sterling pounds per year – funded by a reduction in the budget of aid abroad.
Reeves previously confirmed that the government will revise its controversial decision to limit winter fuel payments to those who receive services tested on means.
Although the government can share certain information on which will receive payment as part of the expenses examination, total details will not be published before the budget later in the year.
The Institute for Tax Studies said that “relatively modest” growth rates mean that “net compromises are inevitable”.
The thinking group said that the level of health spending would dictate if cuts had been made in “unprotected” areas – those outside the NHS, the defense and the schools.
