What is a SERT report and why did Karen Read’s jurors want to see it? –NBC Boston

At one point during Wednesday’s deliberations in the murder trial of Karen Read, jurors came out and asked Judge Beverly Cannone if they could see the “SERT” report from the Massachusetts State Police search the property located at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts, where John O’Keefe’s body was found.

Cannone denied their request, telling them all the evidence had already been presented.

“You have all the evidence in this case,” Cannone said. “What you have is the evidence in this case. You will not receive any additional evidence.”

Read is charged with murder in the 2022 death of O’Keefe, her Boston police officer boyfriend. She is accused of dropping him off at another police officer’s party, then hitting him with her SUV. But her defense team says she was framed.

But what is the SERT report asked of jurors on Wednesday, why did the judge reject their request, and could their question give us an idea of ​​the direction in which their deliberations are leaning?

On June 3, jurors heard testimony from Massachusetts State Police Lt. Kevin O’Hara, commander of the state police Special Emergency Response Team, or SERT. He testified about how his team was called to 34 Fairview Road in Canton on the day of O’Keefe’s death to help investigators search for evidence.

O’Hara also testified that his team helped recover six or seven broken taillight pieces and one of O’Keefe’s sneakers. Jurors were shown a series of photos of the snowy yard showing where the taillight pieces and sneaker were found.

Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts School of Law, provided insight into the jurors’ question and Cannone’s response during Wednesday’s episode of “Canton Confidential.”

“Well, what she’s saying is that the evidence is closed at this point, so therefore you would only reopen it in rare circumstances,” he said. “And the SERT report – the search warrant report itself that the police must file in court – was not part of the evidence offered by the Commonwealth or by the defendant. Since the evidence is closed, they cannot use than what was properly submitted to the court, so they cannot reopen the case to provide this evidence.

Coyne said he also thinks the jurors’ question indicates they are taking the case very seriously.

“What it says is that they are going to pursue this issue much more deeply than I think the defendant would like … and certainly some of us thought the jury would not retire, we are over 10 hours old already,” he said. “It is not that time means whether we are guilty or not guilty, but I suspect that Mrs Read is sleeping a little less soundly tonight than she has been the last two nights.”

Tensions were high in court Wednesday as the jury in Karen Read’s murder trial deliberated its first full day.

NBC10 Boston insider and courtroom commentator Sue O’Connell had a similar view.

“What that means is they look at the evidence, which is exactly what you want jurors to do, right? They don’t just go and vote and not go back to see what the testimony and evidence was presented in court. What that means is they’re looking at every aspect of this case. »

She said SERT’s testimony contained many different information about how many tail light parts were found on the lawn at 34 Fairview Road and where and how the evidence was stored.

“There were some small and some big inconsistencies,” O’Connell said. “So I think that question was, ‘Hey, we’re trying to put this together to figure out what happened.'”

“Of course the problem here is that there is no report from SERT,” she added. “There may be one, but it wasn’t presented as evidence. So they went back in front to figure out for themselves how these taillight parts fit together and how that helps them form an opinion on whether Karen Read is guilty or not guilty.”

Gn headline
News Source :

Back to top button