USD1 – A controversial start on the Stablecoin market
WLFI, supported by Trump, recently launched USD1, a stablecoin set to the US dollar. Supported by the vouchers of the US government, dollars depots and other cash equivalents, USD1 will be deployed on Ethereum and Binance intelligent chain networks.


Source: X
However, the launch sparked controversy. Senators, led by Elizabeth Warren, have raised concerns about conflicts of potential interests due to Trump’s family with significant equity in WLFI.
They questioned the implications of a financial product linked to an in -office president, warning risks to the financial system. The moment of the beginnings of the USD1 is also a more in -depth examination, especially since the US Congress debated by the Act on Engineering. This could grant more regulatory control over stablecoins from politically influential entities such as WLFI.
Act of engineering and regulatory landscape
The law on engineering is a bill to regulate stablecoins. He seeks to grant the federal reserve and greater surveillance on stablecoin issuers like USD1. If it is adopted, it could introduce stricter standards of compliance and surveillance practices.


Source: warren.senate.gov
Trump’s financial involvement and his implications
A key concern is the financial participation of President Donald Trump in WLFI, the USD1 issuer. Critics argue that having a president in office as a large stakeholder in a financial company could compromise regulatory decisions, especially if independent agencies like the OCC and the Federal Reserve are influenced by political pressure.
This unprecedented situation raises concerns about the integrity of financial regulations, recalling political pressures during the 2008 financial crisis.
If the Act on Engineering is adopted, it could grant the Federal Reserve and the WC to control more on the stablecoins. However, the controversy surrounding USD1 highlights a broader problem – how to regulate stablecoins without stifling innovation. Regulators may need to apply the disinvestment or transparency of the WLFI to maintain market confidence. Not approaching these conflicts could feed the uncertainty of the market.