
The post of President Donald Trump by insisting that it would be “the ideal time to buy” shared hours before announcing that a pricing pause aroused concerns of the possible initiate.
In an article in Truth Social on Wednesday afternoon, the president announced that he was allowing a 90-day break and “a price reversible considerably reduced” after receiving calls from “more than 75 countries” by trying to negotiate agreements.
Only three hours before the announcement, Trump posted on the same account: “It’s time to buy !!!”

The shares began to skyrocket after Trump’s declaration, the S&P 500 climbing more than 5% and the Nasdaq 100 up 8%. Before the break, the stock market had been unstable, with dives in recent days, leading economists to worry about a possible recession.
However, the two succession positions of the two positions were noted by social media users, who began to raise concerns about the question of whether the negotiation of initiates could have occurred.
“Trump Frontran his own announcement to suspend the prices by saying it’s a” good time to buy! “3 hours before news for the actions touch,” tweeted a user. “These are levels of madness that we have never seen before.”
LMAO – Trump Frontran His own ad to suspend the prices by saying that it is a “big moment to buy!” 3 hours before the immense news for the actions strike.
These are levels of madness that we have never seen before. pic.twitter.com/eftso4qlka
– Coffeezilla (@Coffeebreak_yt) April 9, 2025
“I want to know what the professions were made by members of the Trump administration before these confused rates?” Another implored user.
I want to know what the professions were carried out by members of the Trump administration before these disarticulated prices?
Who, if someone has short-circuited actions before the prices announce? Who bought on the market before the announcement of this break? Who benefits? https://t.co/urwbfxa4sh
– Ahmed Baba (@ahmedbaba_) April 9, 2025
The announcement of the break led several users to wonder if the Democrats would investigate, while others noted the model of implementation of Trump and stopping tariffs.
“Trump was with the markets so that his wealthy friends could buy low. His behavior should be studied as initiate negotiation,” said a user.
“If the prices are really the answer, why would he stop them?” A published user.
However, not all countries are included in the price break. Trump noted that the prices on China would in fact have increased to 125% in response to the implementation of 84% of prices on the United States, the same percentage as the United States initially planned to train the country’s exports.
Trump noted in his social article of truth that the countries included in the break “do not have, at my strong suggestion, retaliated in any way, of form or form against the United States”.
China has not yet commented on Trump’s new pricing increases.
© 2025 Times Latin. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without authorization.