(Bloomberg / Greg Stohr and David Voreacos) – The Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Trump administration to deport a group of Venezuelans detained in Texas, granting them a stay of being sent imminently to a notorious prison in Salvador.
The detainees had submitted urgent requests to the High Court, a federal court of appeal and two courts of first instance to block their expulsion.
“The government is responsible for not withdrawing any member of the putative class of prisoners from the United States until the new ordinance of this Court,” said court order. Judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissident, he said.
The wave of activities in the case included an emergency hearing Friday evening before the American district judge James Boasberg in Washington, where a lawyer from the Ministry of Justice said that no eviction flight was scheduled for this night or Saturday.
The lawyers of the men submitted their requests less than two weeks after the Supreme Court let President Donald Trump take over the attempt to deport alleged members of the gangs of Tren of Aragua under the law on extraterrestrial enemies of 1798. But the high court judged that they had to be “a reasonable time” to challenge their deportation to a federal court in the district.
Boasberg said that because men are detained in Texas, he does not have the power to rule on the dispute.
“At this stage, I just don’t think I have the power to do anything,” Boasberg told lawyers from the American American Liberties Union representing men.
The allegations raise new questions about the compliance of the administration to the High Court order. The request of the Supreme Court went to Alito, which is assigned to the management of emergency issues in Texas. Alito, one of the most conservative judges in the court, could have acted alone or refer the case to the complete court of nine members.
Boasberg saying that he is unable to act, the case had embodied a high court order, or decisions on similar emergency requests filed with a Federal Court of Appeal based in New Orleans and a Federal District Judge in the Northern Texas District, where many men have been recently transferred.
Without judicial intervention, hundreds of people “can be referred to a possible perpetuity penalty in Salvador without any opportunity to challenge their designation or move,” said lawyers for men in their request from the Supreme Court.
The group had been informed that they would be expelled on Friday afternoon and had already been loaded on buses, according to a legal file.
Boasberg interrupted the hearing for 30 minutes, so the lawyer for the Ministry of Justice Drew Ensign could collect more information on any flight plans. Upon his return, Ensign said that he had spoken with officials from the Ministry of Internal Security. They said that even if it was not planned to withdraw people on Saturday, they “reserve the right to withdraw people,” said Ensign.
ACLU’s lawyer, Lee Genernt, said: “It doesn’t give us confidence that there will be no planes.”
The detainees would have received an opinion in English only who could not explain how they could contest their expulsion or how long they had to do it.
“The opinion that the government provides does not comply with the ordinance of the Supreme Court at a distance,” said lawyers’ lawyers in their Supreme Court file.
Boasberg, on March 15, unaccompanied to the government to overthrow planes which transported people to Salvadoran prison without first having a legal examination of their affairs.
During the hearing, Ensign said that Washington was not the appropriate place to deposit so -called Habeas Corpus petitions to challenge deportations. Boasberg finally accepted, saying that they should raise it in the Northern Texas District or with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Genernt said many men had been transferred to the Northern Texas District after a judge in the South Texas District made a temporary order prohibiting their deportations. Ensign said they had been moved there everywhere in the United States. Genernt said men’s lawyers would deposit petitions in the 94 United States judicial districts.
Asked earlier Friday to find out if he had authorized the operation, Trump said: “I don’t know the group you are talking about, but if they are bad people, I would certainly authorize it, yes.”
In addition, a Washington Federal Court of Appeal temporarily prevented Boasberg from starting the criminal contempt procedure from the events of March 15.
The administrative suspension gives the Court of Appeal for more time to examine how it will manage the conclusion of Boasberg according to which the representatives of the government showed a “deliberate contempt” towards its order. The panel of three judges presented an information calendar which ends next Friday.
The Supreme Court affair is AARP c. Trump, 24A1007.
–Aude the help of Hadriana Lowenkron.
More stories like this are available on Bloomberg.com
© 2025 Bloomberg LP
Originally published:
California Daily Newspapers
