The strikes of the law firm of the former second gentleman Doug Emhoff take care of Trump

The law firm who employs Doug Emhoff, husband of former vice-president Kamala Harris, is the last to conclude an agreement with the Trump administration and to comply with the president’s policies.

Trump on Tuesday announced that Willkie Farr & Gallagher, that Emhoff joined as a partner in January, agreed to provide at least $ 100 million in Pro Bono legal work during President Trump’s time in the White House and beyond. The president said that the services will devote themselves to helping veterans, families of the golden stars, members of the application of laws and the first stakeholders.

Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform, which the company agreed to fight against anti-Semitism and not to engage in “dei” efforts.

“Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP proactively contacted President Trump and his administration, offering their decisive commitment to end the armament of the judicial system and the legal profession,” the White House said in a statement. “The president holds his promises of eradication of the partisan good in America and to restore freedom and justice for all.”

Emhoff told the management of his law firm that he disagreed with the conclusion of an agreement with Trump, according to a familiar source with conversations that were not allowed to speak publicly.

Harris and Emhoff did not respond to a comment request Tuesday

Trump’s agreement with Emhoff’s cabinet is the last in an extent of agreement between the White House and the main American law firms that the president accused of liberal prejudices, frivolous or fraudulent disputes or another professional fault.

The president’s efforts have largely made the alarm among the elected democrats as well as the constitutional and campaign lawyers on their impact on the separation of powers anchored in the constitution of the United States and the independence of the judiciary.

“Actions against law firms are clearly illegal. The capitulation simply encourages lawyers’ firms,” ​​said Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the UC Berkeley Law, who tried to rally other deans of the Faculty of Law to speak to him against the targeting by the White House of individual law firms, with limited success. “The best hope was their collage and fight against illegal compensation orders.”

The head of Emhoff’s company – which has 1,200 employees in six countries – confirmed the agreement, according to Trump’s position.

“The substance of this agreement is in accordance with the opinions of our cabinet on access to legal representation by customers, including professional customers, our commitment to comply with the law with regard to our employment practices and our working history with customers in a wide range of political points of view,” said Thomas Mr. Cerabino, the president of the cabinet, according to Trump’s post.

Emhoff, 60, worked as a lawyer for entertainment, media and intellectual property, and was hired to help advise societies, entities and people in the midst of the crisis or dealing with the change of justice, according to the cabinet’s announcement when it was put on board in January.

Cerabino said at the time that Emhoff was “a trusted advisor for many world business leaders in a wide range of industries”.

Shortly before Trump announced the social media agreement on Tuesday, Emhoff spoke with the students of the Georgetown Law School.

“The rule of law is attacked. Democracy is attacked. And therefore, all lawyers must do what we can repel,” he said. “American lawyers have always been on the front line, fighting for civil rights, for justice. … I love being a lawyer, that’s what we do: we are fighting for people. We are fighting for what is good. ”

.

Trump attacked the main law firms for employed lawyers who participated in cases against him and his allies in the past, including the supporters who storm the American Capitol on January 6, 2021. He also targeted them to promote diversity, actions and inclusion initiatives, including in hiring, and to have been pretending to be pretending Bono.

Trump has published a presidential memorandum threatening all sanctions law firms, revoked security authorizations and other sanctions if his administration determines that they have undergone the federal government.

Several companies have concluded agreements to pre -empt or avoid additional reprisals, while others have continued, alleging that they are illegally targeted for reprisals.

Paul, Weiss, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison agreed to contribute $ 40 million to legal services for Trump to defend and represent customers, whatever his political affiliation. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom has agreed to provide more than $ 100 million in free services for initiatives supported by Trump.

The leaders of these companies defended the agreements, arguing that the work promised within the framework of the interests of companies.

Several other companies have continued the administration for its attacks.

“For more than 100 years, Jenner has remained firm and has disrupted our customers against all opponents, including against illegal government action. We are going to do this again to do exactly this,” wrote Jenner & Block in a recent declaration about his decision to plead. “Doing otherwise would mean compromising our ability to zealously defend all our customers and capitulate the unconstitutional coercion of the government, which is simply not in our DNA.”

The Wilmerhale firm hired the eminent conservative lawyer Paul Clement to manage his case.

Much in the legal world, including eminent academics, fell on the agreements that law firms have concluded with the Trump administration, fearing that they represent a major threat to the legal profession and the basic principle of American law, that everyone deserves the representation of a lawyer competent – whether or not a political ally resides in the White House.

“The way the justice system is supposed to function is that everyone has the right to advise and that you are not punished for having represented politically unpopular people,” said a Washington, DC, DC, a lawyer, who asked anonymity to speak frankly because they feared reprisals. “This is a more blow from our government system for bad law firms like this.”