The organization a press release at the OLAF The initial information about this lette opened by eight MEPs, which then dismissed it due to “insufficient soupons”.
“Given that-lous also raised this question in a bilateal way during a union with (itälä) on December 20, 2022, they had the posterity of contacting us
In competition with the European prosecution
City Itälä now wishes to endeavor to prove the relevance of Olaf in the landscape in constant evolution of the fight against corruption in the EU. For example, he illustrates, the agency’s reports are not public, due to legal counters; Or, he admits that the lack of transparency constitutes the UN. A supervisory committee currently verifies that the Olaf does not establish unification on parties located on one side of the political spectrum.
But the institution is increasingly concerned about competition with the European prosecutor’s office (BPGE), a new gendarme of the antifraude of the EU, which sometimes causes friction between the two.
During a hearing at the Partendre, the head of the European prosecution Laura Coduța Kövesi criticized the contribution of OLAF to the detection of criminal affairs within the European Union. “The level of cooperation with Olaf is very low,” she said about their partnership.
This is not how ITälä sees them choose them.
“I was a little surprised that she did not call me before making these publishers. It’s not the right one has chosen to do.
This article was first published by Politico in English and was published in French by Jean-Christophe Catalon.
Politices
