The United States Office in Copyright has published the AI directives this week that said that no laws should be clarified when it comes to protecting the rights of the fatherhood of humans producing AI AI works.
“Copyright and AI questions can be resolved in accordance with the existing law, without the need for legislative change,” said the copyright office.
More than 10,000 commentators have weighed on advice, some hoping to convince the copyright office to guarantee more protections for artists as IA technologies are advancing and the border between works created by the man and has it seems more and more blurred.
But the Copyright Office insisted that the Copyright Debate of AI was settled in 1965 after commercial computer technology began to move forward quickly and that “difficult paternity questions” have d The first was raised. It was the first time that officials had to think about the amount of human creators in works created using computers.
At the time, the copyright register, Abraham Kaminstein – who also played a decisive role in the codification of fair use – suggested that “there is no single answer” to questions about Copyright on computer -assisted human paternity. And the Copyright Office agrees that this is still the case today.
“Very few luminous line rules are possible,” said the copyright office, with an obvious exception. Due to “insufficient human control over the expressive elements” of the resulting works, “if the content is entirely generated by AI, it cannot be protected by copyright”.
The office has also specified that this does not mean that the work helped by AI can never be protected by copyright.
“When the AI simply assists an author in the creative process, its use does not modify copyright of production,” said the copyright office.
Following the advice of Kaminstein, the officials plan to continue to examine the disclosure of AI and to weigh, on a case -by -case basis, which parts of each work are authorized and which parts are written by man. Any expressive element automated by man can be protected by copyright, said the office, but any aspect of the work considered as having been generated only by AI cannot.
