The Chatgpt Summary score helped me get a technological job with a six -digit salary

This test also filed is based on a conversation with Malhar Shah, a 34 -year -old technical advance that lives in New Jersey. The following has been modified for duration and clarity.

When I started to apply for jobs earlier this year, I thought that my best blow to landing interviews was to optimize my curriculum vitae as much as possible.

One of the most effective strategies I used was to ask for AI tools like Chatgpt and Gemini to assess my curriculum vitae – both overall and by section – on a scale from one to 10 (one being the worst and 10 being the best). I also asked the AI ​​to suggest targeted improvements.

I wanted to Find ways to reduce the noise of candidates monitoring systems – the automated filters that some companies use to detect and classify curriculum vitae. I felt confident to be able to make a strong impression once I reached the interview phase.

My job search lasted around 120 companies and has led to 10 to 15 interviews. I believe that the integration of Curriculum Vitae’s comments of AI tools played a key role by helping me to win a position of technical manager with a six -digit salary. My original curriculum vitae has marked about seven or seven years and a half, while the version which finally obtained the work won nine and a half chatgpt and nine from Gemini.

Chatgpt and Gemini helped me optimize my curriculum vitae

I started by downloading my CULGPT CURGIPT CURGRIP and to ask for comments and a note from curriculum vitae. Then, to collect a wider range of ideas, I did the same with the Gemini.

Although I did not spend much time adapting my curriculum vitae to each description of individual position, I created distinct versions for the four main types of roles that I cibais: technical lead, the staff engineer, the director of engineering and the main engineer. I asked IA tools to help me develop curriculum vitae for each of these roles and to assess my curriculum vitae along the way. My target score was eight or better.

Things are sometimes a little confusing. For example, Chatgpt could assess a version of my curriculum vitae a new one, while Gemini gave him a seven – and he was not always clear why. Comments could also be inconsistent. If I asked Chatgpt to suggest improvements to a curriculum vitae which he had marked at seven, by applying these changes could increase the score. But if I have downloaded this revised curriculum vitae to a new chatgpt cat, I would sometimes get a different score.

Over time, it has become clear that these tools have not followed a coherent rating system. Their notes were based on the context of each conversation I would have with the AI ​​tool: which version of Curriculum Vitae that I shared, how I supervised my questions and what criteria were applied.

Receiving a perfect 10 was difficult, although I managed it at certain times. I never asked the AI ​​tools to generate a curriculum vitae that would mark 10 perfect, because I wanted to make sure they did not hallucinate or not include inaccurate information. Instead, I focused on the refinement of my curriculum vitae using the suggestions of the tools.

In the end, it does not matter that all my CVs marked a perfect 10. What was intended is that I thought that the comments of AI helped me continue to improve my curriculum vitae.

Once I felt that I had a solid curriculum vitae at hand, I started to apply for a few jobs to see how I will get out. If I have not heard of employers, I would revisit AI tools to make additional adjustments. When I started to be more successful, I felt confident that my curriculum vitae was in a strong place.

AI has also helped organize and format my curriculum vitae

The most useful part of using AI tools to improve my curriculum vitae has been to obtain clear and real -time comments and practical suggestions on how to improve it. The AI ​​helped me to rephrase things to seem clearer and more effective, include the right keywords to pass the candidates’s monitoring systems and organize my experience in a way that brought out my achievements. This also facilitated the way to browse several curriculum vitae projects quickly, adjusting the language and the layout until my curriculum vitae feels polite. If I had to choose the IA tool that I found the most useful, I would say that the Gemini.

In addition to requesting AI tools to assess my curriculum vitae, I also asked for advice on formatting, helps to compare different versions and suggestions on how to adapt it to specific jobs – including high -level roles and applications to the best technological companies. I too I have advice on how to rewrite sections like my professional summary to appear more concentrated, more impactful and focused on leadership.

Overall, the use of AI in this way helped to make sure that my curriculum vitae corresponded to what companies were looking for and gave me a better chance of disembarking competitive roles.

Human connections and internet research have also been useful

In addition to using AI tools to improve my curriculum vitae, I also used them to refine my cover letters and execute simulated interviews to refine my behavioral and technical responses.

However, I cannot credit all my job research success to AI tools. When I decided to improve my curriculum vitae, I started by carrying out research on the latest trends in technological role applications. I discovered that simply listing my skills was not enough: to go through candidates’ follow -up systems, I had to highlight the concrete achievements of my past roles.

Some of the best comments I obtained during my job search did not come from an AI tool, but from a former colleague. He suggested that I limit my job search to no more than two hours a day, to reserve time to stay lively on employment skills – including an AI – then spend the rest of the day with my family. With hindsight, I think it was a very wise advice.