Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg were surrounded by hundreds of academic athletes in Athletecon when the news announced that the NCAA regulation of $ 2.8 billion had been approved by a federal judge. In a room full of university athletes, they felt like the only two people who understood the severity of the situation.
“I am about to be paid,” said Moore, a division I football player I told him.
“Yes, you are about to be paid, and many of your athlete friends are about to have you cut,” she replied.
Moore has recognized that his answer could be a section, but the sprawling Home Regulation opens the way to university athletes to obtain a share of income directly from their schools and gives a few lucky a shot to long -term financial stability, it increases authentic concerns for others.
Schools that OPT INT will be able to share up to $ 20.5 million with their athletes in the next year from July 1.
So, what happens to non-revenue-generating sports which, apart from football and basketball, are almost all of them?
This is a question that is in mind for Ootsburg while she enters her last year in Belmont, where she participates in the athletics team.
“My initial thought was: is this good or bad?” What does that mean for me? How does it affect me? But more importantly, in the situation as a whole, how does that affect athletes as a whole? ” OOTSBURG said.
“You look at the figures where he indicates that most income, up to 75% to 85%, will go to football players. You understand that this comes from television offers, but then is it, how does that affect you in the back?” Asked Ootsburg. “Let’s say that 800K goes to other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things such as care, installations, resources or even snacks? ”
Moore has similar concerns. She says that most female athletes do not worry about the quantity – if necessary – the money they will receive. They fear how changes could have an impact on student-athlete experience.
“Many of us prefer by far that our resources and our experience as a student-athlete will stay the same, or perhaps better, rather than receive 3000 dollars, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle accommodation because we don’t have them, and the sports training room is not stopped,” said Moore during the weekend because Athletics is not stock “.
One of the biggest problems, said Ootsburg and Moore is that athletes do not know the changes. At Athletecon in Charlotte, in North Carolina, they have declared, perhaps the biggest change in the history of university sports was a push notification up shoulders by those which are directly affected.
“Athletes do not know what’s going on,” said Ootsburg. “Talking to my teammates is so new, and they see the headlines and they say to themselves:” Ok, cool, but someone will explain that? ” Because they can read it, but there are so many underlying factors that enter this area.
Some coaches also try to Understand what will happen.
Mike White, coach of the national team champion of Texas, called “the great unknown right now”.
“My sports director, Chris Del Conte, said that it was like navigating a flat world and getting out of the edge; we just don’t know what was going to be there, especially the way the landscape changes,” he said during the Women’s College World Series in Oklahoma City. “Who knows what is going to be?”
What about walk-ons?
Jake Rimmel obtained an intensive course on the regulation in the fall of 2024, when he said that he had been cut off from the Cross-Country team of Virginia Tech alongside several other walks. The subject maintained the chamber affair for weeks, because the judge has essentially forced schools to give to athletes cut in anticipation of the approval of a chance to play – they must win the place, no guarantee – not to mention the limits of alignment.
Rimmel made his luggage and returned to his parents in Purcellville, Virginia. Over the past six months, he has held a glimmer of hope that he might be back.
“The last six months have been very difficult,” he said. “I felt so alone through it, even if I was not. I was just feeling that the whole world was there – I saw teammates from my teammates and other people I knew by doing all these things and always being part of a team. I had the impression of having been put to the gone and in break, while they continue to do all these things.”
The news that the regulations had been approved sent Rimmel in search of details.
“I haven’t seen much about the limits of the list,” he said. “Everyone wants to talk about Nile and the sharing of income and I mean, it’s really a big piece, but I haven’t seen anything on the limits of the list, and it is obviously my biggest concern.”
The answer only presents any more questions for Rimmel.
“We hoped for more than one forced decision with Grandfathering, which is only voluntary, so I am a little skeptical of things because I have no idea how schools will react to this,” Rimmel told the Associated Press.
Rimmel always decides what suits him best, but has echoed Moore and Ootsburg by saying that the answers are not obvious: “I just hope that schools will be able to make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who have been cut.”
___
The sports writer AP Cliff Brunt contributed.
___
AP University Sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
