See inside SCIF, high security rooms that keep the security of military secrets

Military officials are required to use compartmentalized environments approved by the government as SCIs for the very sensitive information they process.

SCIF apply strict “need to know” protocols, reducing the risk of unauthorized access, unlike cat applications where users can be accidentally added Or hackers can make their way inside.

Although the signal has the same type of end -to -end encryption used by the US government, it can always be compromised. The popularity of the application between troops and government representatives makes it a privileged target for hacking groups, which prompted the Pentagon to publish an opinion on the vulnerabilities of the digital platform a few days before the Atlantic published its first bomb report.

“It was a frightening thing to realize that I inadvertently discovered a massive security violation in the National Security System of the United States,” Goldberg told NPR in Subsequent.

President Donald Trump has minimized the serious violation of national security as a “problem” and said that no classified information had been discussed in the cat, which was called “Houthi PC Small Group”, PC for “Committee of Directors”.

Hegseth doubled this particular point, arguing that “nobody sent war plans” in the reported cat. Michael Waltz, Trump National Security Advisor, who added Goldberg to the group, took the “full responsibility” for the “embarrassing” security violation.

“There is a difference between the inadvertent release against malicious and sloppy and malicious leaks of classified information,” said national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard during a conference hearing.

In response to these cat characterizations, the Atlantic then published the messages almost completely not expelled to allow people “to draw their own conclusions” on the importance of the content.

The group cat included details such as the types of weapons to be used and the expected impact periods, as well as strategic discussions during the duration of the operation.

“There is a clear public interest to disclose the kind of information that Trump advisers have included in unsecured communication channels,” wrote the Atlantic in the follow -up report, “in particular because the figures for the senior administration are trying to minimize the importance of shared messages.”