Richard Gelles, Scholar of Family Violence, Is Dead at 73

Richard Gelles, a prominent sociologist, had been one of the nation’s foremost defenders of family preservation, the practice of reuniting biological parents with their children even if they had abused them.

But after studying the horrific deaths of many children at the hands of their parents, including a 15-month-old whose mother suffocated him to death, Dr. Gelles did an about-face.

He took his outrage to Washington in the mid-1990s and helped draft landmark legislation that said the safety of a child should supersede attempts to reunite a family. The new law made it easier for children who were languishing in foster care, because their biological parents still had custody, to be put up for adoption.

Dr. Gelles died on June 26 under hospice care at his home in Philadelphia. He was 73. His son David Gelles said the cause was brain cancer.

For many years, Dr. Gelles was a strong proponent of keeping families together, as federal law and social policy called for, even when child welfare agencies knew the parents had been abusive.

But his research, and a rash of shocking child abuse cases, helped convince him that some parents were not fit to be parents.

In “The Book of David” (1996), the story of a mother who suffocated her 15-month-old son, Dr. Gelles showed how the family preservation model and child welfare agencies had failed “David” — the facts of the case were actually a composite of several such incidents — and thousands of other children. Among the statistics he cited was this: Of the 2,000 children who are killed nationally every year by their parents or caretakers, half die even though a governmental agency has been monitoring the families.

“Rich was an unapologetic critic of the child welfare system,” Mary M. Cavanaugh, dean of the Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, said in an interview. “He believed that due to unsupportable adherence to family preservation policies, children were being placed at risk for further abuse and death.”

The story of David helped Dr. Gelles crystallize his view that the rights of the child should outweigh the ideal of family preservation.

Critics latched on to his use of composites to challenge his conclusion; being removed from a family and left in foster care, they argued, often had its own negative consequences. The controversy rages to this day.

“He was not a beloved guy,” Dr. Cavanaugh said. “But he didn’t mind being unpopular. He was not afraid to speak the truth.”

Dr. Gelles, who was a professor at the University of Rhode Island at the time, took a sabbatical and went to Washington to work as a fellow on the House Ways and Means Committee. He was instrumental there in shaping the landmark Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997.

That act replaced 1980 legislation that said states had to make “reasonable efforts” to reunite families before putting them in foster care. The new law said that if a child had been in foster care for 15 of the previous 22 months, states had to terminate the biological parents’ rights so the child could be put up for adoption.

Until then there had been no time limit at all, and children could languish in foster care until they aged out. The new legislation, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, enabled more children to be adopted.

“Rich’s critique of the child welfare system not only indelibly shaped public policy,” Dr. Cavanaugh said, “but his work protected and saved the lives of innumerable children.”

Richard James Gelles was born on July 7, 1946, in Newton, Mass. His father, Sidney, made and sold neckties. His mother, Clara (Goldberg) Gelles, was an artist, potter and homemaker.

He attended Bates College in Maine, where he developed a passion for sociology. After graduating in 1968, he went on to earn his master’s in sociology at the University of Rochester in 1971 and his doctorate in sociology at the University of New Hampshire in 1973.

Source link

Comments are closed.