Harry, who left the British royal family in 2020, said that he is not talking to his father in the midst of his security details.
The Prince of the United Kingdom, Harry, said that he wanted to reconcile with his family, but his father, King Charles III, will not speak to him in the midst of his security details, while the benefits of his leaving the British royal family continued in 2020.
In an interview with the BBC on Friday, Harry, who moved to the United States with his wife, Meghan, said that he did not think he would be able to bring his family back to the United Kingdom.
The interview was released just hours after Harry lost a legal battle to try to restore his protection against police during the UK visit.
“I would love reconciliation with my family,” said the prince. “Life is precious. I don’t know how long my father has. He will not speak to me because of this security thing, but it would be good to reconcile. ”
The Buckingham Palace revealed last year that Charles had been diagnosed with an unpertified form of cancer, although aid was optimistic about the progression of its treatment.
In response to Harry’s interview, Buckingham Palace published a statement, saying: “All these questions were examined several times and meticulously by the courts, the same conclusion drawn on every occasion.”
The London Court of Appeal rejected Harry’s attempt earlier to overthrow a decision in 2020 by the Interior Ministry, the Ministry responsible for Police Services, which said that it would not automatically receive protection against personal police in the United Kingdom.
Three judges from the Court of Appeal found it unanimously that the government’s decision was not unreasonable.

Judge Geoffrey your recognized in a 21 -page judgment that Harry felt badly treated and that his lawyer had advanced powerful and moving arguments in his name. But he said that the prince’s grievance was not a legal reason to challenge the decision to refuse him regular security.
“From the point of view of the Duke of Sussex, something may have been wrong, in the sense that an involuntary consequence of his decision to step back from the royal tasks and to spend the majority of his time abroad received a more tailor-made level of protection and generally less than when he was in the United Kingdom,” said.
“But that does not, in itself, give a legal complaint.”
In his interview with the BBC, Harry described the decision on Friday a “good old -fashioned establishment” and accused the royal house of having influenced the decision.
He said the security issue had been “used as a lever” to control it and urged his father and the government to help. “There is a lot of control and capacity in my father’s hands,” said the prince, also known as the Duke of Sussex.
“In the end, all this could be resolved through him, not necessarily by speaking, but by deviating, allowing experts to do what is necessary.”
Harry, 40, the youngest son of Charles and the late Princess Diana, jostled the convention of the royal family by carrying the government and the press to Tabloid in court.
Since the royal family left the royal family, he and his wife Meghan have been very critical of the Royals in television documentaries, an explosive interview with the host of the cat of Chat Oprah Winfrey, and in particular in the biography of Harry, of the replacement.