Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s trip to Colombia is ‘the height of hypocrisy’ over couple’s security concerns, experts say
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s latest trip abroad has raised eyebrows among royal experts over their alleged security concerns.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have spent the last four days in Colombia at the invitation of Vice President Francia Márquez.
They arrived in Bogota on Thursday, where they met with Marquez and toured a charter school before participating in a social media briefing, according to People.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle also met with Invictus Games athletes on Saturday. That same day, they took part in a drumming lesson and learned about other cultural traditions and tours. Similar events continued through Sunday.
PRINCE HARRY AND MEGHAN MARKLE’S STAFF ‘TURNING POINT’ SUGGESTS ‘SOMETHING IS WRONG’: EXPERT
The couple also participated in several discussions and panels on digital security, one of the couple’s main focuses of work through their Archewell Foundation.
During one of those roundtables on August 16, Markle told the audience, “We should be a role model for how we want our children to be raised and the world that we raise them in. It doesn’t matter where you live. It doesn’t matter who you are. Either you personally or someone you know is a victim of what’s happening online. And that’s something that we can actively work on every day to address,” according to People.
Concerns about online and travel safety have some experts questioning Harry and Meghan’s thought process.
“This tour is the height of Harry’s hypocrisy,” royal expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital. “A new step in their ‘world tour of private life.’”
KING CHARLES REFUSES PRINCE HARRY’S APPEALS AFTER HE COMMITS ‘CARDINAL SIN’ AGAINST HIS FATHER: EXPERT
She continued: “He said he was concerned about safety in the UK (but) Colombia is considered a much more dangerous country.”
The U.S. State Department has placed Colombia under a Level 3 travel advisory, urging visitors to “reconsider travel” due to “crime and terrorism.”
“This whole tour is the height of Harry’s hypocrisy.”
The British government website issues a similar warning, advising against “all non-essential travel to certain areas of Colombia”, citing the risk of kidnapping and an unstable political situation, in addition to crime and terrorism.
“It seems odd that Harry and Meghan would consider London too dangerous to visit without royal protection, but would be perfectly willing to visit a country known for its drug-related violence,” Christopher Andersen, author of “The King,” told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
He added: “Their security measures in Colombia are described as massive, and they should be. Colombian Vice President Francia Marquez, who invited Harry and Meghan to visit her country and is accompanying them, has been the target of numerous death threats and assassination attempts.”
Prince Harry is engaged in a long and drawn-out legal battle over his claim to access taxpayer-funded personal protection.
The legal battle began more than four years ago, when the youngest son of King Charles III claimed he and his family were in danger during their visit to his home country because of hostility towards them and his wife Meghan Markle. The 39-year-old said the couple had faced a relentless hounding by the British media.
In April, a High Court judge dismissed his appeal against an earlier ruling upholding a government commission’s decision to limit his access to publicly funded security services.
MEGHAN MARKLE AND PRINCE HARRY THINK ABOUT POLITICS AND DARE TO ‘VOICE THEIR OPINIONS’ ON WORLD STAGE, EXPERT SAYS
“I think this trip puts an end to any hope Harry might have had of convincing the king to change his mind,” Andersen said.
But it is not just the security issue that puts Prince Harry at odds with his father, King Charles III, and his brother, Prince William.
Andersen noted: “The Sussexes’ decision to visit a high-risk part of the world isn’t what’s really upsetting the royals. Like their visit to Nigeria in May, Harry and Meghan’s trip to Colombia has all the trappings of a royal tour — and it’s infuriating Prince William and the king. The Sussexes no longer represent the Crown, and yet, for all intents and purposes, wherever they go, they’re treated pretty much the same as working royals when they travel abroad.”
“Harry and Meghan have a lot of power and they don’t have to answer to the palace officials who set the agenda and make all the decisions, pushing the royals around like pieces on a chessboard. There’s an element of jealousy at play here,” he added. “Even the king would like to have the kind of freedom that Harry and Meghan have to do what they want.”
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
“But of course, no one would care if Harry and Meghan weren’t royals, and the perception that the Sussexes are profiting from their connection to the Crown is driving King Charles, Queen Camilla and especially William more than a little crazy.”
Relations within the royal family have been strained since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down as senior royals and moved to California.
“I think this trip puts an end to any hope Harry might have had of convincing the king to change his mind.”
The couple welcomed a son, Archie, and a daughter, Lilibet, and have embarked on several projects, including deals with Netflix and their Archewell Foundation. Meghan Markle also recently launched a lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard.
Regarding Meghan Markle’s comments about her children’s online safety, Fordwich added: “If she is truly concerned as a mother about her own children, as she claims, she has destroyed family relationships on both sides, her own family and the royal family. Her children will not grow up with the love and security of having close cousins.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Royal correspondent Russell Myers told Sky News Australia this month: “Harry was told by senior members of the royal family that if he wanted a relationship with the rest of the family, then first and foremost he had to stop talking about them.”
Myers said: “They can’t make money off their connections to the royal family. They’re going to have to realise that if they want to have a relationship with the rest of the royal family, they can’t denigrate them.”