Skip to content

Similar efforts have been made in state legislatures across the country, from Idaho to Missouri to Rhode Island, with Republicans seeking to restrict the way issues of race and racism are taught in schools. public. They specifically targeted Critical Race Theory, an academic movement that postulates that historical models of discrimination created race-based disadvantages that persist today in modern power systems.

On his first day in office, Biden signed an executive order saying the federal government should “take a comprehensive approach to promote fairness for all”, especially people of color “who have been historically underserved, marginalized and negatively affected by persistent poverty. and inequalities. “

“Our country faces converging economic, health and climate crises that have exposed and exacerbated inequalities, while a landmark movement for justice has highlighted the unbearable human costs of systemic racism,” Biden wrote in the prescription.

The rule proposed by the administration protested by Mr. McConnell and others does not require any program change. Instead, it sets priorities for federal competitions or grant programs that schools might choose to apply to for initiatives that “take into account systemic marginalization, prejudice, inequality, and discriminatory policies and practices in the workplace. ‘American history.’ In addition to citing Project 1619, the ruler cites the work of Ibram X. Kendi, the author of the book How To Be An Anti-Racist.

“It is essential that the teaching of American history and civics create learning experiences that validate and reflect the diversity, identities, histories, contributions and experiences of all students,” says he does.

In their letter, Mr. McConnell and the other Republicans denounced this focus.

“The youth of our nation do not need an activist indoctrination that focuses solely on the flaws of the past and divides our nation into divided camps,” they wrote. “Taxpayer-backed programs should emphasize the shared civic virtues that bring us together, not push radical programs that tear us apart.”

They also argued that Project 1619 “became infamous for putting misinformed advocacy ahead of historical correctness,” and that “quoting this debunked advocacy confirms that your proposed priorities would not focus on critical thinking or critical thinking. precise story, but on spoon feeding. students a biased story.

Source link