Macy’s asks to be abandoned from the Diddy’s sexual trial

• Macy’s wants a judge to withdraw him from a trial of sexual assault against Sean “Diddy”.
• The trial indicates that Macy violated a law on gender violence by ignoring an attack on the Herald Square store.
• The applicant himself describes Diddy as “a sexual predator of equal opportunities,” says Macy.

Macy’s wants to be moved as a defendant in a prosecution of sexual assault against Sean “Diddy” Combs – and their arguments of dismissal include the call of the rap entrepreneur “A sexual predator of equal opportunities”.

The October trial accuses Macy of raping a law on the violence between the sexes and the violence of New York by covering an alleged attack of Combs against a male employee at the flagship store of Herald Square in 2008.

The chain of the World Department maintains that the applicant, identified only as John Doe, cannot accuse Macy of gender bias because, in the same trial, does himself describe the combs as if willing to attack men and women .

“The applicant’s own allegations establish not only that it was a homosexual aggression, but that Mr. Combross sexually assaulted men and women, without regard to sex,” said Macy’s lawyers in the court documents last week.

“The applicant does not deal with the fact that his own allegations establish that Mr. Combres was a sexual predator of equal opportunities.”

A spokesperson for Combs refused to comment on the argument of Macy, rather referring to his own request to reject the case against himself and his companies, filed on Tuesday.

His motion also calls into question the applicability of the New York sex violence law. Combs has repeatedly denied any sexual assault.

“Mr. Combs denies fully false and salaried complaints against him in the complaint and is convinced that he and the defendants of the company (against which no fault or participation is even alleged) would be fully justified if this case should proceed to “,” According to his request in dismissal.

The decision of the judge of the district court J. Paul Oetken on the advisability of rejecting Macy could come at any time. A decision on the combat dismissal offer is due only a little after the applicant’s response.

Macy’s is by far the deepest accused in a blizzard of more than 30 legal assault legal proceedings filed against the rapper in the past year.

The plaintiff said in his trial that at the time of the alleged attack, he worked in the flagship store of Manhattan de Macy for Ecko, a rival fashion brand for Sean John clothes in Combs.

His 19 pages trial Allegue that he worked in a stock room when Combs entered with three armed bodyguards that struck him and threatened to kill him.

Combs then raped her orally in the stock room, while calling her “Ecko” and narrowing: “Do you like that, White Boy?” The trial alleys. After what would have been a two -minute attack, Combs then caught Sean Jean Clothing’s arms, left storage with his bodyguards and made clothes to buyers “as if nothing had been,” said The trial.

The applicant alleys that the chain did nothing to support him when he presented himself with his allegations against Combs, and rather dismissed him to protect a several million dollars agreement with Sean Jean.

By fighting to be abandoned as a defendant, the lawyers of Macy’s argued that the trial does not allege the employees of the store were in any way involved in the attack.

Macy lawyers also underlined the victims of New York victims of the law on protection against violence motivated by the sexes. Man’s lawyers had argued in their trials that the law on gender violence entitled their client to request damages at Macy.

Macy aut that the law did not allow complaints against companies for assault before 2022, and that the trial provided no evidence that alleged violence was motivated through gender.

The alleged “white boy” of Combs does not refer to sexist prejudices, supported the lawyers of Macy in the articles signed by the lawyer Daniel Kotler.

The word “boy” in this scenario “works mainly as a term of status and reprimand (boy against man) rather than a comment of gender (boy against girl) – it is indeed an inversion of classic use and Racist of the term ” boy “to degrade or lower African-Americans,” said Macy’s team.

Kotler did not immediately respond to a request for comments for this story.

Buzbee, the plaintiff’s principal lawyer, covers the court documents that the law on gender violence in New York covers the companies involved in attacks before 2022. He also argues that “the fact that the Combs have violently assaulted the two sexes, it does not exercise in one way or another copy in one way or another, boats him “of the law.

“A fairly new argument that should fail,” Buzbee told Business Insider Tuesday arguments of Macy’s dismissal.