The Justice Department filed a lawsuit Thursday seeking to break up Live Nation, alleging that Ticketmaster’s parent company harmed consumers and violated antitrust laws by exerting outsized control over the live events industry.
The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York and supported by attorneys general from 29 states plus Washington, D.C., alleges that Live Nation engaged in practices that harm the entire live entertainment industry – from artists and fans to venues and startups looking to break into the business.
“Live Nation relies on illegal and anti-competitive behavior to exert its monopolistic control over the live events industry in the United States, to the detriment of fans, artists, small promoters and venue operators,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a press release. “The result is that fans pay more in entry fees, artists have fewer opportunities to play concerts, smaller promoters are squeezed out, and venues have fewer real choices in ticketing services. It’s time to break up Live Nation.
Among the accusations against Live Nation:
- That he worked with a venue management company called Oak View Group to get customers to sign exclusive deals to use Ticketmaster. Co-founded by Irving Azoff, an influential entertainment executive and former chairman of Live Nation, Oak View oversees dozens of arenas around the world. A representative for Oak View did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
- That he sought to stifle competition in the concert promotion industry by threatening retaliation and acquired new bands he viewed as threats.
- Let him sign long-term “exclusion” agreements with venues that prevent them from turning to alternative management companies and using multiple ticketing platforms.
- This Ticketmaster is becoming the default ticketing platform for many artists, as Live Nation controls a large portion of the venues where they seek to play.
Live Nation and Ticketmaster have disputed accusations that they are a monopoly, citing growing competition for online ticket sales, particularly in the secondary or resale market, from companies like StubHub and Vivid Seats. Ticketmaster now also offers resold tickets.
Ticketmaster has been facing complaints from fans and artists for years, but anger came to a head in 2022 following a botched rollout of tickets for Taylor Swift’s “Eras Tour.” The Senate Judiciary Committee then held a hearing on the company’s role in the ticketing industry.
The lawsuit filed Thursday joins a handful of other major antitrust efforts launched under President Joe Biden, who has made rooting out alleged monopolies a cornerstone of his presidency. In July 2021, he signed a decree aimed at promoting competition. Among the most significant steps taken by the Biden administration, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in March accusing Apple of exercising monopoly power in the smartphone market, which the tech giant has denied.
Biden said that while he is a “proud capitalist,” “capitalism without competition is not capitalism, it is exploitation.”
Ticketmaster and Live Nation, which merged in 2010, control about 70% of the live event ticketing and venue market, although the companies have disputed that figure.
Several bills have been introduced over the past year to address issues affecting ticket buyers. The House passed the Key Event Ticketing Price Transparency Act (TICKET) last week, which would require sellers disclose all costs and fees in advance when they put tickets on sale.
Live Nation supported the move and said it supports ticketing reforms such as anti-bot legislation and banning speculative tickets, or the sale of tickets that are not currently in the seller’s possession.
“The bipartisan support for these reforms shows that protecting fans and artists is in everyone’s best interest,” the company said in a statement. “We look forward to working with policymakers to make these changes into law.” »
Recently, more than 250 artists signed a letter in support of the Fans First Act, introduced in the Senate in December. The bill aims to improve price transparency and consumer protection, as well as prevent bad actors from charging exorbitant prices. It would also strengthen the Better Online Ticket Sales Act, passed in 2016, which prohibits resellers from using software to buy tickets in bulk, further banning the use of bots in ticket sales.
Dan Wall, Live Nation’s executive vice president for corporate and regulatory affairs, responded to complaints about ticket sales and prices in an article published on Live Nation’s website in March.
Ticketmaster is seen as “a massive ticket retailer that buys large quantities of tickets and posts them for sale at prices determined by Ticketmaster,” Wall wrote. But in reality, he says, ticket prices are set by artists and sports teams.
Consumer advocacy groups welcomed reports earlier this year that the Justice Department was considering taking Live Nation to court.
A lawsuit against the company would show “the seriousness of this situation and the need for action to protect fans,” Mark Meador, president of the Fan Fairness Coalition and a Republican antitrust expert, said in a statement in April.
“This will be a critical step in holding Ticketmaster and Live Nation accountable for monopolistic and anti-competitive business practices that have eroded free competition in the live event ticketing industry and harmed millions of fans,” he said. he declares.
Ticketmaster also argued that artists and their teams set the terms of ticket distribution. In a web page called Ticketing Truths, Ticketmaster claims that players are responsible for pricing tickets at face value. And in collaboration with managers, agents and promoters, artists also decide which venues to play in, when to put tickets on sale and how to sell them, it is specified.
As for service fees – a frequent target of criticism among fans – the company says they are set by the sites, who also keep most of the revenue from the fees. “A portion” of the fee revenue goes to the ticketing company and is used to pay credit card fees.
News Source : www.nbcnews.com
Gn bussni
