Judgment expected in the legal battle of Prince Harry on the demotion of security in the United Kingdom –

Image source, EPA

The case of Prince Harry is contesting the way in which the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) made the decision on its security arrangements after leaving his royal work in 2020.

During the hearing of the court of appeal last month, Harry’s lawyer argued that Harry had been subject to a “supposedly tailor-made process”.

Shaheed Fatima KC told court that he had been “chosen for different, unjustified and lower treatment”.

Last year, the High Court ruled that there had been no illustration in the initial decision of Ravec.

Because the Ministry of the Interior has the legal responsibility of Ravec’s decisions, it opposes the call on its behalf.

His lawyer, James Eadie KC, argued that Harry’s decision to take a step back from his life as a Royal who works led to a “set of circumstances”, and it was fair to adopt a flexible approach to his level of security.

Although Ravec has “reference conditions” to decide security measures, there was “nothing to suggest that they had been designed to function in a rigid and non-flexible manner,” he said.