The field: Kyle’s message was that the United Kingdom is “open to investment” and ready to help Western democracies stay in advance in the AI race. “We have an excellent story on the security and exploitation of AI opportunities,” he told journalists on Monday. And he said he was not trying to upset the status quo when it comes to writing a bill on AI.
Snuggle up: “What I’m not going to do is disturb the regulatory or voluntary regulations (reached at Bletchley Park),” said Kyle. “But I want to put a little more strength in the way it is supported. It is in our manifesto, and we simply examine the right legislative landing zone and the way we consult the idea. »»
On the fence: When asked if the United Kingdom would sign the summit declaration today, after Politico recovered that he was waving in the middle of a lack of American support, Kyle did not commit. A government source brought a bellicist tone last night, telling the Guardian that the declaration should be “outright in British interests”.
Not just Great Britain: The French will not care to annoy the United States – but not to have the country that has started all this summit process among the signatories will be strange. Another French ally and the EU Member State is also on closing and seeks security in number, according to an official. However, dozens of countries are expected to sign it, including a large part of the “world south” and the EU.
China’s victory? Anne Bouverot, Macron’s envoy for the summit, opened his procedures yesterday by stressing the need to guarantee that AI leads to “shared progress”. By not signing the declaration, the American risks allowing China to present itself as a more reliable multilateral partner – although it also has red lines on the project. Beijing support for Open Source, however, aligns with the co-animators of France and India.
Goodbye to Bletchley: The draft declaration also disappointed those who are concerned about the risks of AI. Max Tegmark, president of the Future of Life Institute, said that he “ignores science” and the heritage of the Bletchley British summit, and urged countries not to sign. Gaia Marcus, director of the ADA Lovelace Institute, said that the project disclosed “did not rely on the mission of making the AI safe and trustworthy, and the safety commitments of the previous summits”.
Politices
