In the middle of economic chaos, some Republicans want to control the prices in the congress

Washington – While the fallout on President Trump’s prices continue to roll the world economy, some Republicans in the Congress began to discuss how to limit the president’s ability to perceive prices – taking a rare step to slow down the party leader.

Republican leaders have largely struck an attitude “wait” to the prices, as well as with their continuous effect on the diving stock market and the negative feeling of consumers. President Mike Johnson Tell to journalists On Monday, the congress “would weigh on it, but with the president, with the administration in tandem”.

“I think you have to give the president latitude, the track to do what was elected to save again and that our business is properly balanced with other countries,” said Johnson.

But others at Congress – including some California Republicans – do not want to wait.

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IOW) presented a bill last week, alongside Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) And other legislators of both parties, to reaffirm the convention authority and limit the power of the president to trade policy. The law on the 2025 commercial examination would force the president to inform the congress of any new rate within 48 hours and to provide an analysis and a reason for their objective. It would also allow the 60 -day congress to review the tax.

“I have long expressed my opinion according to which the congress delegated too much authority over the trade of the executive of republican and democrats,” published Grassley on X.

Representative Don Bacon (R-NEB.) Said on Sunday that he would present a company bill to the House, he could therefore progress in both chambers.

Californian support

Already, several Republican legislators – including the representative of California David Valadao, a Republican of Hanford who holds the precarious swing seat in the 22nd Congress district – suggested support for legislation. Valadao said on News Nation on Sunday that he needed to “take a look” to Bacon’s proposal, but it is “something that should be taken into consideration”.

“I have always been someone who supports power at Congress of the way our founding fathers originally designed,” said Valadao. “And this is one of these powers that belongs to the congress, and we should examine this, I think, very seriously.”

Valadao represents a rich agricultural strip of the central valley, which houses hectares of almond farms and lemon trees. The Congress member said that he had heard voters on both sides of the tariff debate – those whose exports receive a strong reception from other countries and those who wanted higher prices on competing industries. As a dairy agent himself, Valadao said that he used to put pressure on legislators for prices against countries whose labor standards or regulations differ from the United States, which makes American companies more difficult to compete.

“They are in competition with me on the shelf of the grocery store, and it was frustrating,” said Valadao. “I think that (prices) should be used as a tool to reach a playground.”

Other support for the legislation took place on Monday, while the markets continued to decline and the bankers spoke of an imminent recession. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) Said on Fox’s affairs on Monday that she wanted to “give the president” to see the effect of the prices. But, she admitted, “being able to contribute to these prices is extremely important.”

A spokesperson for representative Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills), who represents another district of the Swing Congress in California, said that the representative was “encouraged” by the White House news that the countries aligned themselves to negotiate a relief of the prices.

“The Kim representative knows the importance of free trade for the southern economy of California and believes that we can strengthen American industries while promoting free trade with allies and partners sharing the same ideas,” said spokesman Callie Strock in a statement. “Although prices can be a strategic tool, the Kim representative is concerned about the impact that long -term prices can have on families and small businesses that already injure high taxes and lifestyle.”

Another Republican of California, the representative Tom McClintock, poster On X last week, “our commercial objective must be: zero prices, zero subsidies and zero non -tariff barriers. Prices always affect the whole country requires them. Their only justification is to take advantage of business partners to adopt free trade agreements. I hope this is where the president is going. “

Asked about the comments of Elk Grove’s representative, spokesperson Jennifer Cressy said that “her opinions have not changed” since 2018, when McClintock has made prices in the speech of a house floor.

“There is no more ideal way to transform abundance into rarity than to take a price on imports,” said McClintock at the time. “Remember that each producer of a company is also a consumer. No consumer benefits from higher prices and no producer benefits from rarer materials. Each country that has tried protectionism has suffered terribly, including ours. ”

Despite the grunts at the Congress, Trump took ahead. He accelerated the trade war with a position on Monday on his website, threatening more strikes against China – the largest commercial nation in the world, which retaliated against the 34% price of Trump last week by issuing his own 34% tariff against the United States, the White House also indicated that the president would oppose a bill to tighten his power compared to the tariffs, if it adopted Politico.

Are Trump’s prices constitutional?

The Constitution gives the Congress the power of taxes, rights, imports and exports – in particular “to regulate trade with foreign nations”.

But over the years, the congress has given the executive branch more latitude on foreign trade, starting with the law on reciprocal trade agreements in 1934.

“When you look at a decree in this field, it is really a question of whether what the president does or not of one of these statutes where the congress has essentially launched the ball to the executive,” Levinson said.

Already, the new Civil Liberties Civil Alliance, a non -profit legal group that disputes administrative overeating, has filed a complaint alleging that the prices are unconstitutional. Trump invoked the international law on emergency economic powers to issue prices, a move that the new civil liberties alliance has affirmed is not authorized under the law.

Bacon agreed on “Faced with the nation” of CBS News Trump’s announcement was not a real exercise in emergency powers on Sunday but a change in pricing policy.

“This is where Congress must intervene and say, do we really want to create this new policy on prices?” Said bacon. “And if this is the case, this should come from the congress, not from the president.”

Another bill, presented to the Senate last week by the Democrats in Virginia, would in fact stop the American prices on Canada – which Trump promulgated by declaring a national emergency on the fentanyl crisis – by ending the national emergency.

Josh Robbins, a lawyer for the Pacific Legal Foundation, said that an additional legal problem with the president’s prices is that the congress was wrong to put its tax authority to the executive branch.

“The Congress has unconstitutionally abandoned too much of his authority … for the president in a law which really does not have a daycare on the way in which he can regulate foreign trade once he declares an emergency,” said Robbins.

During Trump’s first term, when he invoked steel prices, there was a bipartite effort at the congress to slow down the power of the president, who ultimately failed.