How to look at the Polish presidential election as a political pro

The presidential race will have a big word to say that Poland plays in the Great EU League or if it is withdrawn in isolation alongside other populist countries in Central Europe such as Hungary and Slovakia.

During the eight years of PIS power, he fought with the EU and other allies on efforts to politicize the judicial system, to attacks against LGBTQ +rights, to strengthen abortion rules and to use state money for party objectives. However, he also directed a flood of silver to poorer voters and gave people often enabled from small towns and villages that their more conservative values ​​were important.

Is the president important?

The president of Poland is a largely ceremonial job – the holder can live in a fancy palace, signs to people becoming professors, generals and ambassadors, and is the commander -in -chief of the armed forces, although it is the government which establishes a foreign and military policy, not the president. It can launch legislation.

But it has real power – but of a negative type. A president can oppose his veto to bills which can only be replaced by a majority of three fifths in Parliament. This is a level that no party has in the political landscape deeply divided in Poland. The president can also send legislation to be analyzed by the Constitutional Court, a higher court, which is largely equivalent to a veto.

Defense spells the advantages Work in 2010: “Honors, chandeliers, palaces and veto”.

President DUDA supported by PIS has blocked a large part of the Tusk legislative program, resulting in growing frustration among its voters and one of the reasons why the government sees a regular fall in public support.