Categories: USA

Defense Lawyers Seek to Block Special Counsel Report in Trump Documents Case

Defense lawyers asked both the Justice Department and a federal judge on Monday night to stop the special counsel, Jack Smith, from publicly releasing a report detailing his investigation into President-elect Donald J. Trump’s mishandling of classified documents after he left office in 2021.

The two-pronged attempt to block the report’s release arrived as Mr. Trump was only two weeks away from being sworn in for a second term as president. With the case against Mr. Trump already dismissed, the report would essentially be Mr. Smith’s final chance to lay out damaging new details and evidence, if he has any.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers, in an aggressively worded letter to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, said they had recently been shown a draft copy of Mr. Smith’s report, calling it an example of the special counsel’s “politically motivated attack” against Mr. Trump. They demanded that Mr. Garland not allow Mr. Smith to make the report public and “remove him promptly” from his post.

“The release of any confidential report prepared by this out-of-control private citizen unconstitutionally posing as a prosecutor would be nothing more than a lawless political stunt, designed to politically harm President Trump,” the lawyers wrote. In separate court papers, lawyers for Mr. Trump’s two co-defendants in the classified documents case, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, sought a more direct path toward stopping the release of Mr. Smith’s report. They asked the judge who oversaw the case, Aileen M. Cannon, to issue an emergency order to bar Mr. Smith from making the report public until the case “has reached a final judgment and appellate proceedings are concluded.”

Both attempts to block Mr. Smith could face an uphill battle.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers have no power to force Mr. Garland to stop the report from coming out, and their letter amounted to little more than a belligerent request. It is also unclear whether Judge Cannon would have the authority to tell the attorney general how to handle a report by a special counsel that he himself appointed, especially when the case is technically out of her hands and in front of an appeals court.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

s92oQeSxPt

Recent Posts

Ted Cruz: Trump prices will even make American cars more expensive

This story is available exclusively to subscribers of commercial initiates. Become an initiate and start…

18 seconds ago

11 Denim dresses a fashion writer buys for spring

I am always a game to experiment with my style constantly evolving, but some proven…

1 minute ago

The teen footballer given weeks to live reveals how he will beat the diagnosis of cancer after discovering a mole after the guys holidays in Magaluf

Footballer Charlie Watson says he will win his fight with skin cancer Watson, who plays…

3 minutes ago

Trump’s Supreme Court Oks Trump to teacher training subsidies in California

Washington - Friday, the Supreme Court ruled for the Trump administration and raised the order…

4 minutes ago

James Gunn’s latest images divide the Internet

Up, up and "Aarrrrrrrrrrrh !!"? Images of the highly anticipated revival of the DC studios…

8 minutes ago

The judges of the North Carolina side with a republican colleague were close to the elections of the Supreme Court

Raleigh, NC (AP) - A North Carolina Court of Appeal razed on Friday with the…

9 minutes ago