Google’s antitrust research antitrust research phase is underway, and the government seeks to force major changes. The next few weeks could reshape Google as a business and considerably modify the balance of powers on the Internet, and the two parties have a plan to do.
With opening arguments from today, the United States Ministry of Justice will seek to convince the court that Google should be forced to sell the chrome, to lead Android and to make other fundamental modifications. But Google will try to paint the government’s position as too extreme and rooted in past grievances. No matter what’s going on during this test, Google has not abandoned the hope that it can go back in time.
Advantage for the Department of Justice.
The Ministry of Justice (DoJ) has a major advantage here: Google is guilty. He lost the responsibility phase of this resolutely trial, the court concluding that Google had violated the Sherman Antitrust law by “acquiring and voluntarily maintained the power of monopoly”. Regarding the court, Google has an illegal monopoly in research services and general research advertising. The purpose of this essay is to determine what to do on this subject, and the Doj has some ideas.
This case, supervised by the district judge of the United States, Amit Mehta, takes place in a particularly unflattering backdrop for Google. He was shaken by a loss after a loss in his antitrust cases, including the case of Google Play subject to Epic, as well as the research case which is involved here. And last week, a court judged that Google abused its monopoly in advertising technology. The remedies in the case of the Google App Store are currently pending while waiting for the call, but this problem does not disappear. Meanwhile, Google faces even more serious threats in the remedy phase of this trial.
