But the position of Miliband is too simplistic, said David Reiner, professor of technological policy at the University of Cambridge.
“The government has a number of contradictory claims, which I do not think you can fully reconcile,” he said. “The idea that we can move relatively quickly to reduce emissions, and at the same time, we see that in one way or another, was reflected in lower invoices, and that we also have a certain sense of energy security – it is not clear that we can completely stimulate this circle.”
The work is “not on the right track” to keep its electoral promise to reduce the annual invoices by £ 300 by 2030, agreed that Adam Berman, director of politicians at Trade Group Energy UK. Climatic policies “will reduce energy bills,” he said, “but it will take time for it to materialize.”
In private, some labor officials admit the same thing.
“It is too late in terms of (the lower invoices contributing to victory) a second parliament, because people want to see their energy bills come down now, not in 2030,” said a senior government official, has granted anonymity to speak frankly about internal discussions.
The gas enigma
The work is not yet faced with a full -fledged public reaction. But we could be on their way, said Scarlett Maguire, director of the JL Partners political consulting cabinet. “This is essentially there for picking. … I would say that work does not have much time.”
Politices
