EXCLUSIVE: Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds do not hold back today on the reasons why a so-called gag prescription is necessary for “extrajudicial declarations” by the main lawyer of Justin Baldoni in the dispute in constant opposition between the It ends with us features what happened during the shooting of the film of domestic violence distributed to Sony and what happened before its release.
“Obligning the advice to take into account the ethical rules which bind them is not a gag prescription; This is a mechanism which would guarantee that the procedures of this court are not harmful by the conduct of the lawyer outside the courtroom, “said lawyer Esra Hudson for the couple Friday evening in A letter to judge Lewis J. Liman on Baldoni, his main lawyer Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s Wayfarer Studios and others.
“The Wayfarer parties try to draw a dangerous false equivalence which can have deep consequences not only for this case, but for other women who are sexually harassed in the workplace given this case,” said the lawyer for Manatt, Phelps & Phillips continues in the four -page correspondence which has just been deposited before the New York Federal Court.
In what has become a very fast match of legal and media volleyball, the file of the Gossip Girl Alum and dead Pool The actor’s team occurs a little more than 24 hours after Baldoni lawyer Kevin Fritz, wrote to Liman rejecting the request of the January 22 couple for a gap prescription, saying that “the animated parties invoke Now the disciplinary rules of the lawyer as an intimidation tactic ”.
Read the letter from Blake Lively and the lawyer for Ryan Reynolds on the smear campaign and a need for prosecution here
For a multi-avocado combination case which honestly saw all the parties and respective public relations play the press as much other than the shorts with “Tactical Gameshansfor”, as the letter of January 23 calls it, Fritz n ‘ Has shown no hesitation or irony by hitting the hard sentimental button in its correspondence.
“The results were completely calamities for Mr. Baldoni and the other parties of Wayfarer, which have instantly become objects of contempt and public contempt,” wrote the lawyer, referring to the pink slipping of his client ( which always represents Lively and Reynolds), the A-Lively Lively support has collected and loss of work and all hope of Iewu The continuation since all this became public last month. “Already, the Wayfarer parties have been exiled from Polie company and have suffered damages totaling hundreds of millions due to Ms. Lively’s burnt media campaign.”
Fritz was referring to Baldoni, his studios Wayfarer, the head of Risis Pr Melissa Nathan and her publicist colleague Jennifer Abel in another attempt to return the scenario to the initial deposits of sexual harassment and reprisals of Lively, who alleged a Online smear campaign against her by the Baldoni Nathan-Diled team.
Related: Justin Baldoni’s lawyer decreases the “revolutionary sexual allegations” by Blake Lively while the prosecution steals; Business brands Heart of Dispute
It should be noted that Nathan and his tag company were the same costly public crisis team hired by Johnny Depp in the depths of his legal battles on the accusations of domestic violence of Amber Heard. A media frenzy trial in 2022 in Virginia saw Depp. winning his defamation file of $ 50 million against his ex-wife as an online media campaign against Heard attacked, threatened and mocked him Aquaman star. While Nathan and Abel denied having sparked a smear campaign against Lively last summer – they say they didn’t need it because the Internet hated alone – the similarities between ferocious digital aggressions against Heard and those which were animated in the lead at the exit of August 2024 of Iewu are striking.
On January 22, when the parties were disputed with video sequences published by Freedman and the Baldoni team to try to counter Lively’s complaints in its December 20 complaint with the California civil rights department and the replica trial Nye, Lively and Reynolds, Michael J. Gottlieb, sent a letter to him to Liman condemning the Freedman still frank for his strategy of dispute of dispute. The DC-Based Willkie Farr & Gallagher Lawyer Stated That La-Based Freedman “Had Defamed and committed in Further Unlawful Retaliation Against Ms. and That Lively, and asked that HE IMMOSEDIATELY CEASE AND DESIST from Making FUDATHERY, AND RETALIATORY, Ms. Lively. “”
By increasing the challenges this week, Gottlieb added: “The animated parties-reynolds intend to request an appropriate protection order to govern the additional procedures in this case, but given the imminent damage caused by declarations and leaks Drumber of Mr. Freedman, we respectfully ask Mr. Freedman and Mr. Freedman that this court is planning an audience as soon as possible to approach the appropriate driving of the lawyer to move forward in these two related questions. »»
FACING A DEFAMATION AND BREACH OF CONTRACTION SUIT AS WELL FROM STEPHANIE JONES, THE HEAD OF HIS FOR FIRM AND ABEL’S EX-BOSS, BALDONI TOOK LIVELY, REYNOLDS AND THEIR PUBLICIST LESLIE SLOANE TO A JUANUARY 16 $ 400 MILLION DEFAMATION AND EXTORTION ACTION AND EXTORTION The New York Times For 250 million dollars, measures filed on New Year’s day.
In Friday’s letter to the judge, the lawyer for Lively and Reynolds, Hudson, threw there that the alleged smear campaign which was one of the instigators of all this probably happens in one form or another.
Distributing the names distinctly, she wrote:
Even more disturbing, however, it is that the reprisals campaign which, according to Ms. Lively, allegedly allegedly allegedly supported in her complaint, includes very destructive backstage, including the regular commitment of Melissa Nathan With its vast sources of tabloid media to influence a constant flow of negative media concerning Ms. Lively, as well as a sophisticated and “untraceable” digital social media campaign designed to have an impact on social media algorithms against Ms. Lively. The animated-reynolds parties are informed and believe that these efforts have continued relentlessly since the filing of the CRD complaint and may have been accelerated. The administration of justice in this case will be seriously compromised if this behavior continues.
No date has been set at the hearing requested by Lively and Reynolds on a protection prescription, but Liman clearly said he would think that it would be a good idea to melt the pursuit of Lively against Baldoni and Baldoni against Live Tous . When this can happen is also unknown.
