Information that the best national security officials from Donald Trump accidentally shared their attack plans in Yemen with The Atlantic In real time, Washington’s official Washington news lately. But it was not the only harmful leak of information held by the administration this week.
Two calculation sheets of the Trump administration – which each include what many government defenders and representatives say, this is very sensitive information on the programs funded by the US State Department and the American International Development Agency (USAID) – were sent to the Congress and also disclosed online.
The leak, which sent a variety of international groups and non -profit organizations rushing to assess the damage and protecting workers operating under repressive regimes, came after the organizations put pressure on Trump administration to keep the private private information and have received certain insurances that it would remain secret.
Refined to comment, the assistant press secretary of the White House, Anna Kelly, said: “These documents were transmitted to the congress and not publicly published by the State Department.” She urged Roller To contact “the one who disclosed it and in turn made it public”.
The episode is only the last blow of American foreign partners and international aid organizations, many of which have seen their funds targeted and frozen by Elon Musk and its so-called Department of Government (DOGE). The Trump administration has also closed its USAID doors, America’s Foreign Aid Bureau; His remains are folded in the State Department.
The State Department, directed by Marco Rubio, informed a variety of non -profit international organizations and long -standing partner organizations that the upcoming payments of their grants approved by the Congress have been made with certain conditions that the Trump administration wanted to clarify.
As part of their campaign to eliminate what they call “waste, fraud and abuses”, the Trump and Doge team had required complete information on the beneficiaries of subsidies – and the officials of the State Department informed organizations that Musk lieutenants probably planned to transform this information into a spreadsheet or a public database.
The message – according to three sources familiar with the question, as well as the written communications examined by Roller – was very clear: If you do not agree with the supply of all this information or all of this is published online, let us know; However, this decision could or can lead to the end of your planned funding.
The decline has been rapidly of a number of international groups that have spent years, even decades, working with the State Department, USAID and the US government. (Roller has agreed not to appoint these groups, given their leaders and their staff rightly fear the remuneration of Trump and his senior officials.)
Non -profit leaders and others reminded the staff of the State Department – some of whom are dismissed career officials that the Trump team and Musk were doing, and wanted to contain unnecessary damage – that various programs that the ministry had in files were long marked “sensitive” and that their information is not intended for public consumption.
A number of these programs, which are at least partly based on the subsidies of the State Department and the USAID, operate in countries managed by repressive regimes or authoritarian governments. Exposing the key details of these programs and linking them effectively to the United States government would probably facilitate foreign governments to identify citizens or local activists associated with these groups and programs.
Such a decision would open the staff and local allies to intimidation, harassment, pursuit or worse, and would provide fodder to civil servants of these foreign countries who would like to paint dissidents or other political enemies as tools of the United States.
After a burst of telephone calls and messages, the officials of the State Department referred to their partners with a comfort note: although other information is probably published online in the near future, closely and very sensitive information “on certain non -profit subsidies and organizations would be excluded. The officials have promised these groups that this information would remain under rental and key, and the recipients their money.
A few days after these insurances were made, two different documents – one were a spreadsheet concerning the subsidies of the State Department, the other persons concerned by the USAID – were shared with the Congress, and they were disclosed to several media consumer and elsewhere. Today, it is easy to almost find a large part of this online information.
The documents disclosed, according to sources, include some of the same information as several non -profit organizations and international partners had been promised would not be made public. The senior executives and other staff members working in these groups have been particularly alarmed, for example, by the inclusion of certain details concerning programs and non -governmental organizations operating in China, Russia, Iran, Uganda, Cuba and elsewhere.
From Wednesday and well to Thursday, it led to a mad race among these different groups to develop damage assessments on what had just happened; Tender attending a range of staff members and local activists to warn them and confirm that they were safe and ok; And to play what they were all ready to do in the worst cases, according to familiar sources with the situation and written communications and the internal memos examined by Roller.
“Please do not share the calculation sheet that was circulating yesterday with listed rewards listed and if possible delete it or ask to be deleted wherever you saw,” reads a shared message in a private USAID cat at the end of the week. “It contains information on partners working in dangerous environments with a restricted civil space or terrible LGBTQ laws, etc. Some of our friends had to attract staff in an emergency yesterday due to threats and unwanted attention from their governments. Please transmit to anyone you think you need to see this. ”
A senior executive in a non -profit international implementation partner and the US government that has been faced with what Fallout tells Roller: “During all our years of receipt of subsidies from a range of governments, we have never seen the security of the government’s partners treated with such reckless abandonment. People will lose their freedom, and perhaps even more, because of this. ”
Another source knowing the situation – an official of the career of the State Department – says: “Lives are in danger that should not be.”
Colon cancer levels in people under the age of 50 are increasing. James Kinross, a…
Friday, Jim Cramer of CNBC castigated the White House for his approach to commercial policy,…
If only the NCAA tournament had so much excitement. The NIT championship match in Indianapolis…
The United States and the Democratic Republic of Congo are in talks on a mineral…
Jennifer Lopez spent an evening in the theater - and her dramatic and theatrical look…
Ruben Amorim had a difficult beginning of life in Manchester UnitedSir Alex Ferguson took six…