London
Cnn
–
The Duke of Sussex has lost a judicial challenge to the British government’s decision to demarcate its security agreements in the United Kingdom.
Prince Harry, the youngest son of King Charles, had sought to cancel a decision by the British High Court last year concerning the decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Personalities (RAVE) to demarcate his security.
Friday, Judge Geoffrey your said that the arguments presented by the Duke’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima, were “powerful and moving” and that it was “clear that the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated by the system”.
However, after studying all the relevant documentation, your concluded that the feeling of grievance of the Duke was not translated into a legal argument for the challenge of Ravec’s decision.
The case was deeply personal to Harry, who previously expressed how important he was for him to make sure that his family had security during their visit to the United Kingdom.
For the Duke, there was a feeling of not wanting to repeat itself, and he frequently made comparisons between the treatment of his wife Meghan to that in front of his mother, Diana. The end of the princess of Wales died in 1997 after having undergone internal injuries resulting from a high -speed car accident in Paris, while being continued by paparazzi.
Ravec changed Harry’s protection status in February 2020 after he and Meghan resigned as working members of the British royal family and rather revealed their intention to divide their time between the United Kingdom and North America.
Last year, the retirement judge of the High Court, Peter Lane, refused to authorize a judicial examination of Ravec Roll, as Harry asked, concluding that the approach of the committee was not irrational or illegal, and “there was no procedural injustice”.
Harry, 40, returned to the United Kingdom for the two-day hearing at the London Court of Appeal in April. At this hearing, Fatima argued that the judge was wrong and that the Duke had been “chosen for various unjustified and lower treatments” by the committee.
She declared to the panel of three judges before the Court of Appeal that the organization had opted for “a different and supposed process” tailor-made “, but” the appellant (Harry) does not accept that “tailor-made” means “better”.
James Eadie presented the arguments on behalf of the Ministry of the Interior, the ministry responsible for Ravec, telling the court that the decision had never been to withdraw the security of the Duke, but rather that it would not be provided on the same basis as before “.
He said that the decision had been made due to the Harry de la Royale transition who works and living abroad, arguing that this approach served the fifth online to the throne better.
Harry has revealed fears about the security of his family several times over the years. The Duke spoke previously to want to return more frequently to the United Kingdom, saying to the High Court in December 2023 that the country is “at the heart of the inheritance of my children” and that they want them to “feel at home” as much as in the United States.
