A version of this article originally appeared in the short quartz weekend bulletin only. Quartz members have access to exclusive newsletters and more. Register here.
Vienne – The grocery shelves in Vienna are lined with eggs. There is so much that there is a section of eggs dyed for the next Easter vacation, a tradition that many Americans can jump this year. The prices oscillate in a range which amounts to five euros (around $ 5.50) for 10 eggs.
The United States had asked Austria and other European countries eggs during the Bird shortage with influenza. Most descended, pointing to their own growth Bird flu problems And the different food safety standards for eggs in Europe. But there is another tacit factor but commonly understood behind the decision: the prices. Why rush to help the United States when President Donald Trump is Hit Europe with prices And complain that the block “is not just playing”?
This dead end of eggs illustrates the new reality of international trade under the aggressive tariff regime of Trump. As the president imposes radical tasks – including an amazing 20% tariff on European Union goods announced on Wednesday, which Trump called the “Liberation Day” – we are witnessing the birth of a global economy in which countries take small stands when and where they can.
While almost all countries have announced that reprisals, nations, businesses and their citizens are increasingly willing to leave their noses in a way that goes beyond the additional costs slapped in ports, affecting all levels of commerce. What started as economic policy quickly turns into a diplomatic hike, everyday objects becoming pawns in an growing international game.
Through Europe, Facebook groups have mushrooms With names like “Boycott USA: buy French and European!” Attract more than 20,000 members in France only, which seems particularly ready to “The boycott. “Similar groups in Sweden and Denmark have each gathered around 80,000 subscribers sharing strategies to purge American products from their shopping carts.
Sometimes reprisals involve more than consumer choices. On March 6, two days after Trump’s Canadian prices took effect, Hydro-Québec discreetly stopped exporting electricity to New England-a region that is generally based on Canadian hydroelectricity up to 10% of its electricity, According to Canary Media. The company cited “market conditions”, but timing has raised the eyebrows. As summer approaches, New England could soon face higher electricity costs or increased emissions from the shelter of natural gas and oil essentials to compensate.
Even coffee is not immune to commercial policy. Everywhere in Canada, Toronto cafes in British Columbia have renamed their “Americanos” to “Canadians” following Trump’s suggestion that Canada could become “the 51st state”. Although renowned Espresso drinks do not become GDP figures, they reflect something that economists often lack: how prices damage the cultural will that lubricate international trade.
“It is for us to defend ourselves to be ourselves and to remind others that we are not pushed,” said William Oliveira, an owner of the Toronto café who has changed, told Washington Post.
For a nation that has the Boston Tea Party as one of its fundamental creation stories, the reaction should not be a surprise for the Americans. But what makes these small reprisals concerning not their immediate economic impact – renowned cafes and Teslas boycotted will not crush the global economy. The real danger is double.
Millions of small acts of challenge to consumers apparently without consequences can harm the American brand so as to survive any formal trade policy. While prices can be negotiated with a pen, reconstruction of consumer confidence and goodwill towards Americans and its products could take a generation.
And then there are the global issues of all this. When nations cannot cooperate on something as basic as to share eggs during a shortage, this does not bother with collaboration on really existential challenges such as climate change, pandemics or nuclear proliferation.
Today’s little disputes set the foundations for tomorrow’s diplomatic failures on issues where international cooperation is not only beneficial – it is essential.
